Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 81.1 score against 77.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is just a little bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is incredibly thicker and was released 4 years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bit higher pixels number in each screen inch and a larger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments, a much better video quality and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.