Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an overall score of 83, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is extremely older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still a bit lighter.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a little higher pixel amount per inch of screen, a bigger display and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a much larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos, a way better video resolution, a back camera with more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.