Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | ZTE |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a 77.8 score against 76.6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is much newer and notably thinner than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's, but it's also way heavier. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a just a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a camera in the back with more mega pixels, a much larger camera sensor and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.