Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | ZTE |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 20's 77.8 score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is newer and way thinner, but just a little heavier than the ZTE Axon 20. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10 version, providing you some additional features.
ZTE Axon 20 counts with a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a little higher pixels density and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 50 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 20. If you want to save some money, you can get the ZTE Axon 20, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.