Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | ZTE |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 78.1 against 77.8. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a lot older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a bigger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4600mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a lower 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with a lot worse 50 mega pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.