Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 is better than vivo X50 Pro, with a general score of 83.3 against 75.4. The Apple iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X50 Pro counts with Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 11's body is older, just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. IPhone 11 counts with a bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 11 counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a way worse 828 x 1792px resolution, a little worse pixels amount per inch in the display and a quite smaller display. Vivo X50 Pro features a slightly better camera than iPhone 11, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The vivo X50 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 3110mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.