Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, with an 85.3 score against 75.4. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a somewhat heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro, but they are equally thin. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while vivo X50 Pro works with Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a bit higher pixels density. The vivo X50 Pro features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better camera than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller camera sensor offering a lower image quality and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot better resolution back camera.
Vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 9 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.