Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 has a general score of 88.7, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. IPhone 12 works with iOS 15.x operating system, and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 operating system. Even when the iPhone 12 and vivo X50 Pro were released with only 3 months difference, the iPhone 12 is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
Apple iPhone 12 counts with a faster processor than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. IPhone 12 counts with a more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Vivo X50 Pro features a much better camera than Apple iPhone 12, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.6 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 53 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.