Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than vivo X50 Pro, getting a 93.3 score against 75.4. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's body is newer and a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the vivo X50 Pro. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1170 x 2532px resolution and a bit better number of pixels per inch of display.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a quite superior hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro features a superior camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures in low light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.