Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro has an overall score of 95.6, which is way better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Although iPhone 14 Pro is heavier than vivo X50 Pro, it's a little thinner and incredibly newer. The iPhone 14 Pro has iOS 16.x OS, and vivo X50 Pro comes with Android 10 OS. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a much more vibrant display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 1179 x 2556.
The vivo X50 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone 14 Pro has a better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Vivo X50 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 4315mAh battery size against 3200mAh. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have a same resolution camera and the same (4K) video definition, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.