Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than vivo X50 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 75.4. Apple iPhone X's design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The iPhone X counts with a bit superior processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little bit higher pixels number per inch of screen. The iPhone X's storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as vivo X50 Pro's one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution, a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.