Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, having an 82 score against 75.4. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Apple iPhone XR is an older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier phone than the vivo X50 Pro. The iPhone XR features a slightly better screen than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a little worse pixel amount per display inch, a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 and a quite smaller display.
The iPhone XR has a little better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 47% greater battery size. The vivo X50 Pro has a superior camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.