Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. The Apple iPhone XS is an older device than the vivo X50 Pro, but it's just a little bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. The Apple iPhone XS has a bit faster processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS features a slightly better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density and a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X50 Pro takes much better videos and photos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a larger aperture to take better low light photos.
The vivo X50 Pro features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.