Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, with a score of 80.2 against 75.4. The Google Pixel is an a lot older and a little thicker device than vivo X50 Pro, but Google was able to build it extremely lighter anyway. The Google Pixel features just a bit better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The vivo X50 Pro features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more processing cores and 4 GB more RAM. The vivo X50 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X50 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The vivo X50 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.