Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than vivo X50 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The vivo X50 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X50 Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much more MP back camera.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 Pro has better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.