Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a overall score of 80 against 75.4. Google Pixel 3 is an older phone than the vivo X50 Pro, but it's just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Vivo X50 Pro has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X50 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 48% more battery capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.