Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a a little lighter phone than vivo X50 Pro, but both of them are 0.32inches thick.
The vivo X50 Pro features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little inferior pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376. The vivo X50 Pro features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X50 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Vivo X50 Pro features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4315mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.