Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat lighter device than vivo X50 Pro, but they are equally thin. Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels in each inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X50 Pro features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X50 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations and a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.