Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. Google Pixel 4 XL is a a little bit heavier cellphone than vivo X50 Pro, but both are equally thin. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch in the display.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo X50 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4315mAh battery size against 3700mAh. The vivo X50 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera and a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.