Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. The Google Pixel 4a is a lighter phone than vivo X50 Pro, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features and optimized performance.
Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X50 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 37 percent larger battery size. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much more MP back camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.