Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. The Google Pixel 5 body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, although both were only released with a few months difference. Google Pixel 5 has a little more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
The vivo X50 Pro has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 5 has a processor that's just as good as vivo X50 Pro's processor, both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X50 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images.
The vivo X50 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4315mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.