Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 395 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a global score of 92.1, which is way better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. These devices use Android OS, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's construction is newer than vivo X50 Pro's, although it's a little bit thicker and a lot heavier.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a little better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an incredibly better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a little bit greater pixels count per inch of screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots clearer pictures and videos than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has faster video frame rates, a way larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a more MP back camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features greater battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.