Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 395 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is way better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a global score of 92.1 against 75.4. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has newer 14 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you some additional features and performance tweaks. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition's construction is much newer, but a lot heavier and just a bit thicker than the vivo X50 Pro.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a much more vibrant display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a little larger display, a just a little better display pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1280 x 2800. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a little better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 768 GB more internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition shoots just a bit better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a camera with a better 50 MP resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and higher video frame rate.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has greater battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 30 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.