Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a 77.7 score against 75.4. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. HTC One M9's design is lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, although it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before.
The HTC One M9 features a brighter display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display density. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
HTC One M9 has just a little better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits processor. The vivo X50 Pro features a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Vivo X50 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than HTC One M9, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.