Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. The HTC U Ultra body is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, although it was released many years before. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch in the display. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The HTC U Ultra features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Vivo X50 Pro features a much better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 44 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.