Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a 77.6 score against 75.4. Despite of the fact that HTC U11 is extremely older than vivo X50 Pro, it's body is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM.
HTC U11 has a bit sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel density. The vivo X50 Pro features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a larger camera aperture.
Vivo X50 Pro features a really longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.