Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.93 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Brown, Gold and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 239.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 498 pixels per inch |
| -- | 730 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 10 has a general score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. The Huawei Mate 10 is a just a little bit heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness.
Huawei Mate 10 has a more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel density. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Huawei Mate 10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X50 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Huawei Mate 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Vivo X50 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Huawei Mate 10, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X50 Pro also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Huawei Mate 10, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.