Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Cosmic purple, Emerald green, Space silver and Vegan leather - Orange and Forest green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 30 5G has a score of 87.4, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Huawei Mate 30 5G body is older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the vivo X50 Pro. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
Vivo X50 Pro and Huawei Mate 30 5G count with really similar displays, and although the Huawei Mate 30 5G has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, they both have a display of the same size. Huawei Mate 30 5G counts with a bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X50 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Huawei Mate 30 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Huawei Mate 30 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, a less mega-pixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Huawei Mate 30 5G, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.