Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a global score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. The Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design is an noticeably older phone than the vivo X50 Pro, but it's just a little thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you some extra features and a performance increase.
Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a little bit better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM.
The Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design and vivo X50 Pro have incredibly similar memory to install games and applications, they have equal 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro has a superior camera than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also has a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images, a larger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.