Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.02 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.56 inches (1/1.78") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a score of 85.2 against 75.4. Even though the Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design is better than the vivo X50 Pro, we must highlight that it's also a much older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker phone. These phones use Android OS, but the Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design has 9.0 Pie version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, giving you a couple additional features and performance improvements.
Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design features as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the vivo X50 Pro one, both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design, because it has a 4315mAh battery size. The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design features just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a worse video resolution, a less mega pixels back-facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.