Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G5 is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro, with a global score of 76.1 against 75.4. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG G5 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with some additional features and performance enhancements. The LG G5 design is lighter and a bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before.
LG G5 counts with a bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels count in each inch of screen. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG G5, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Vivo X50 Pro features a little better performance than LG G5, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The vivo X50 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG G5, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The vivo X50 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has a 54% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.