Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Despite of the fact that LG G7 Fit is older than vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and increased performance.
The LG G7 Fit features a much better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixels count in each inch in the display. The vivo X50 Pro features a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit faster CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores. The vivo X50 Pro takes much better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also has a much larger camera aperture, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 44 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.