Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a score of 84.3, which is better than vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features. Despite of the fact the LG G8 ThinQ is older and a little thicker than the vivo X50 Pro, it's design is still a little lighter.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG G8 ThinQ has a better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The vivo X50 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors, lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater storage for games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 Pro counts with longer battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.