Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features. Even being the best we are comparing, the LG G8X ThinQ is an a little thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per display inch.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 Pro shoots better photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.