Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, having a overall score of 78.6 against 75.4. Despite being the best in this comparison, the LG V10 is an extremely older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier device than vivo X50 Pro. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V10 has the previous 5.1 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
Vivo X50 Pro features a better performance than LG V10, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and 7 more cores. LG V10 features a sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
LG V10 counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than LG V10, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The vivo X50 Pro has a really longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 44 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.