Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is much older than vivo X50 Pro, it's body is a little thinner and lighter.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater screen density. LG V30S ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a CPU that's just as good as the vivo X50 Pro one, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X50 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger sensor and a camera with way more MP.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.