Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro, with a general score of 81.3 against 75.4. Although LG V35 ThinQ is extremely older than the vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a little better performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per screen inch. The vivo X50 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.6 diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The LG V35 ThinQ features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 Pro has greater battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4315mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.