Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, with an 81.2 score against 75.4. Both devices in this comparison come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Although LG V40 ThinQ is older than vivo X50 Pro, it's design is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixel count per inch of display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with improved battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and videos and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.