Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Although the LG Velvet and the vivo X50 Pro were released only a couple months apart, the LG Velvet is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet and vivo X50 Pro both count with really similar displays, and although the LG Velvet has a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bit bigger display, they both have the same count of pixels per inch of screen. LG Velvet counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in low light environments, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The LG Velvet features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet's battery lifetime is just as good as the vivo X50 Pro one, although the LG Velvet has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.