Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is a lot better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 10 operating system, so they should provide the user the same operating system features. The LG Wing is a notably heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than the vivo X50 Pro.
LG Wing has a display that is just as good as the vivo X50 Pro one, and although the LG Wing has a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution, they both have the same pixel density. LG Wing counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Wing also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The vivo X50 Pro and the LG Wing feature extremely similar processing units, they have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. Vivo X50 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than LG Wing, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The LG Wing shoots a bit better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a camera with lot more megapixels and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.