Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Microsoft |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a score of 85.3, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a newer and way thinner phone than vivo X50 Pro, but it is incredibly heavier. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a larger display, a little bit higher pixel density and a better 1892 x 2688 resolution.
The vivo X50 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger camera aperture and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Vivo X50 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit longer battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 3% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.