Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer cellphone than vivo X50 Pro, although it is a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger screen. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos, a back-facing camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little better battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.