Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the vivo X50 Pro, having an 86.2 score against 75.4. The Moto G200 5G body is newer than the vivo X50 Pro's, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit superior CPU than vivo X50 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Moto G200 5G and vivo X50 Pro both have really similar screens, and although the Moto G200 5G has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a quite bigger display, they both have the same count of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Moto G200 5G features longer battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.