Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a general score of 77.4 against 75.4. Moto Z2 Play is an a lot older device than vivo X50 Pro, but it's thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a bigger display.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto Z2 Play counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo X50 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X50 Pro features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4315mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.