Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro, with a overall score of 77.6 against 75.4. Although Moto Z3 is older than vivo X50 Pro, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z3 and vivo X50 Pro count with similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater display pixel density.
The vivo X50 Pro has a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot more MP camera in the back and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Moto Z3 features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X50 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 44 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.