Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Motorola One Action's construction is a little bit lighter than vivo X50 Pro, although it is somewhat thicker and was released just 11 months before. The Motorola One Action counts with a bit better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution and a little better screen density.
The Motorola One Action has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo X50 Pro features greater battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.