Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, having an 80 score against 75.4. Motorola One Zoom's construction is older, a little heavier and just a little thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. The vivo X50 Pro has a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px. Motorola One Zoom has just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a 48 megapixels camera in the back and the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
The vivo X50 Pro has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. The vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.