Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, with an 87 score against 75.4. Although the Motorola razr (2020) and vivo X50 Pro were released with only 2 months difference, Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is just a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than vivo X50 Pro. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
The vivo X50 Pro has a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with as much storage capacity to install games and applications as the vivo X50 Pro one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro and Motorola razr (2020) both feature extremely similar processors, both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 48 MP camera in the back, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.