Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, having an 80.3 score against 75.4. Despite being the best device we are comparing here, Nokia 8 V 5G UW is an a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device than the vivo X50 Pro. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X50 Pro features a little bit better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a bit superior battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4% more battery capacity.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP, better video frame rate and a lot larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.