Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting an 80.8 score against 75.4. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Nokia XR20 has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. The Nokia XR20 design is newer than the vivo X50 Pro's, but it is notably heavier and noticeably thicker.
The vivo X50 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM. Nokia XR20 has a bit sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 features a bit longer battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity instead of 4315mAh.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Nokia XR20, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.